RSC, South Bank Show (ITV 1, 28th December 2009)

Though I enjoyed the South Bank programme about the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC)  because of my interest in the Company and its work, I did start to feel that it was more like a promotional DVD, than an in-depth study.  It is sad to see a long running show axed and I hope other shows take its place, and that we see Melvin Bragg in other slots.  I think I need more of the wonderful Culture Show with its weekly mix of short pieces and specials, such as the recent programme focusing on Michael Jackson.  However, though entertaining, this episode of the South Bank show  was not really challenging and it didn’t reveal things about the RSC, that I didn’t know already from reading interviews with Michael Boyd and from the RSC’s own publicity material.  Maybe the overall description of the programme was ‘on message’ as far as the RSC was concerned.

I found the trip to Russia and the background to The Grain Store very interesting.  I also thought that it was great to see actors in rehearsal and to watch the  bit on how the new theatre is progressing.   I thought it was amusing that Mariah Gale and Katy Stephens practice their speeches in funny voices.   However, alongside all this interesting nuggets of information, I felt that the main purpose of the programme was to promote the RSC’s current vision.  The programme highlighted the committment to the ensemble idea and the rationale behind the new theatre space.  Michael Boyd reiterated his distaste of celebrity culture, which he has mentioned in other places.   The programme also gave us the reason why the RSC are committed to  performing new writing and linked all this back to Peter Hall’s vision for the RSC.  What the programme didn’t seem to do was critique the new direction or really place this in the context of other ways that the RSC could evolve and develop.

The idea of the ensemble brings massive benefits, and of course The Histories project is used to as an example to support this approach.  It will be great to see this year’s ensemble at work in new plays next year.  However, it is also very exciting to see new actors and new approaches.  I have written in previous places on the blog that I feel that the ensemble is not making enough of the opportunity to take ideas across more than one play as Greg Doran did in the 2008 season with his utilisation of the mirrored set for three productions.  This ensemble company had been split into two and are in effect, until the Russian plays, two separate companies as far as I could see in the way they approached The Winter’s Tale, As You Like It and Julius Caesar.   Only having the one theatre has meant that there isn’t as much productions.  in 2010, this year’s productions will be repeated and joined by new productions, but with the same actors.   There are benefits of seeing the company play in different spaces and though I love The Courtyard, I  miss smaller spaces like The Other Place and I would love to see a production at The Swan again when it reopens. 

In addition, to the commitment to the ensemble, the new theatre space, the RSC do embrace other approaches.  They do bring in new companies during the ensemble run such as the wonderful Twelfth Night this autumn.  I have also written about how well the RSC productions transfer to the proscenium arch space and maybe it is a positive thing that the RSC can work on the thrust stage as well as in the traditional theatres it also uses.  Finally, I know that some actors had built up a reputation in the theatre before becoming celebrities due to television work, but actors such as David Tennant and Richard Wilson bring enormous benefits to the RSC as does the current RSC ensemble approach.

Reviews

What’s On Stage review

Addicted to reviews…

IMG_0060

I am starting to feel that I am becoming addicted to review broadcasts and reading reviews in newspapers.  The addiction includes watching my favourite programme, The Culture Show and making sure  Newsnight Review has been recorded on Sky + to watch later in the week.   My keenness for reviews also includes  listening to Radio Four’s Front Row and Saturday Review, as well as the wonderful Kermode and Mayo on Radio Five Live.  Did video kill off radio?  My appetite for review watching, listening and reading has been fuelled by the easy accessibility of these outputs in the digital age.   As radio broadcasts are so easily accessible through the iPlayer and podcasts, I am now finding that I probably listen to more radio than I watch television.  This is because it is possible to listen while writing at the computer or when I’m travelling on trains, whereas television means I have to be in a certain place in my house.  I could watch television on my iPlayer as well I know, but it’s not as easy to be working on the computer at the same time.  Being part of the radio audience is much easier than it was and is a massive move forward from when you needed to be near a radio and spent ages moving a wire at the back around to get as signal.  Indeed, radio lagged behind television which became part of the video recording age, whereas you had to be there if you wanted to record anything on your cassette recorder.

As well as easy access to broadcast, in the age of Web 2.0 technologies there are also a slew of blogs to read and I am keen not to miss any theatre reviews, so I can access them al through my Google Reader.  I lap up Michael Billington, Mark Shenton, and Charles Spencer, as well as the rest of the well established theatre reviewers.  However, I also enjoy looking at the blogs, such as the wonderfully engaging West End Whingers, Virtual Scholars and it’s comment on culture, and Peter Kirwin’s meticulous Bardathon.  What I think  are some of the best blogs are accessible from this blog through the right hand side column.  I used to put the Press Night dates in my diary and then try and find space in my day to go out and buy the newspapers.  This of course was very risky.  If the review wasn’t in that day’s edition, it was a waste of time, but if I forget to buy them or couldn’t find the time to go to the nearest newsagent then I missed them altogether.  I suppose I do read the adverts and I must admit it was a video advert on a newspaper site which seduced me into buying tickets for the wonderful Priscilla.  I have been tempted to go to see a production because of a good review.  My visit to As You Like It at the  Curve at Leicester was down to the fact that I read the reviews and felt I must go and see another Tim Supple production.  I still buy newspapers, particularly on a Sunday.  I don’t buy less, but the digital age means I do read more than I did.  The fact that the television and radio is available in a digital form means that I can consume them when it suits me.  I am unlikely to listen and watch more than once, which would be the case if I had planned to tune in to a one off broadcast.

What appeals to me about all this?  Accessing all these reviews and conversations about culture makes me think and shape my own views.  I can choose to be influenced or not.  I like hearing different opinions.  I enjoy being annoyed about what is said and the approach taken, and   it’s like having a dialogue with someone about things I’ve seen.  I am introduced to art, film, theatre and literature, that I might not have considered.  The digital age is providing me with choice and that can only be a good thing.  It feels like the outputs  are free, but the engagement in the reviewing world  leads to me being a consumer somewhere, whether it is in buying theatre tickets, books or becoming a friend of an art galley so I can view exhibitions.  It’s not free really, as ther is a cost is in the broadband  subscription, the Sky + box or the mobile phone network.  It’s also useful to have the space in my own blog to reflect and respond to what I have seen in my own language.  It is my view that the digital age complements cultural outputs and is a really positive way forward.  I would say that digital recording has breathed new life into radio rather than determined it’s death.  The newspaper reivews still lead readers to the adverts if they are read on line and the blogs add another layer of opinion to those traditional review outputs.