Speaking in Tongues (Duke of York Theatre, 12th December 2009)

This was a very complex and interesting play.  I heard someone in the audience say that you had to really concentrate, so I did and was really prepared for the twists and turns. 

I tend to agree with Michael Billington’s review that the play seemed to be set in  time and no where, and I found this made the play a little old-fashioned in feel.  It was a dark play and the auditorium was really dark when we took our seats.   I’m not sure if that was to get us into the feel of the play, but it’s hard to settle into a seat in the dark.

The play opens in a dingy bar and moves to a hotel bedroom.  We soon realise that this is two hotel rooms and these are interconnecting stories.  The play reveals relationships between different characters.  We hear fragments of stories that we are then as an audience asked to piece together.  The actors all play more than one role.  John Simm is an unfaithful policemen and the unemployed Nick.  Ian Hart plays three roles, the cheated husband, the cheating husband and the jilted lover.  We as an audience are invited and directed to fill in the blank.  The therapist is at the bottom of hill and we can work out it is her client at the top in the dream. 

Speaking in Tongues is short and the second half is particularly short, but it is intense as well.  I really enjoyed watching John Simm in the two different roles.  I am particulary looking forward to seeing his Hamlet in Sheffield next year.

Previews and Reviews

John Simm in the Independent
Independent on Speaking in Tongues
Speaking in Tongues in the Evening Standard
The Times on Speaking in Tongues
Speaking in Tongues
WOS on Speaking in Tongues
Official London Theatre on Speaking on Tongues
The Stage on Speaking in Tongues
The Guardian on Speaking in Tongues
Independent on Sunday on Speaking In Tongues and Mother Courage

X Factor (ITV, 12th and 13th December 2009)

X Factor in ice at St Pancras Station

I came across this ice sculpture at St Pancras station and as I was on my home to watch the X Factor.  I think it was there to make us think about climate change and the ice melting at the poles, but I was wondering what it was meant to say about the television programme the X Factor?  Could it be the coldness of the judges portrayed?  Is it about the judges being  ice cool week after week?  That they are really wet underneath?  For me, the ice sculpture represents the transience that the programme needs to survive.  Certainly for me the programme is about the moment that I’m watching.  I’m never really bothered about what happens to contestants afterwards, and I don’t rush out to buy the records.  I enjoy watching at the time and if I’m really interested I will turn over and watch Xtra Factor.  This is why I am finding it really difficult to get into the wait until Sunday to hear the result.  By the time Sunday comes I’ve forgotten whose in the bottom two and what they sang.  Like the sculpture between Saturday and Sunday my memory starts to dissolve.  I’m not convinced either that the show is about making a star a year.  I’m sure it doesn’t help the X Factor brand to have lots of X Factor winners all in competition for number one slots year in and year out.  It needs it’s Steves and Leons (yes who?) as much as its Leonas.  Surely, the brand and the watch-ability factor about promoting this year’s winner.  The judges need to be able to say this is the best year yet and the best ever etc etc…  We’ve got to have short memories, for us to believe we are watching something and new and vibrant.  It’s no good us saying I liked the line up in 2006 better as the programme will start to lose its impact.   

So yes like the ice sculpture, X Factor looks amazing while it’s on air, but will need to disappear to be built up as spectacularly the next year.